Documenting Sell Criteria Before You Buy
How to write sell criteria before you buy a stock: thesis, catalysts, specific kill criteria, valuation ceilings, size limits and time stops, plus a review routine that resists the disposition effect. Worked hypothetical example for a Canadian holding. Educational, not advice.
By AndrewPublished Updated

Most investors spend hours deciding what to buy and minutes deciding when to sell. That imbalance is where a lot of damage happens: holding a broken idea because it’s down, or dumping a good one because it’s noisy. The fix is simple and unglamorous — write your sell criteria before you buy, while you’re still thinking clearly.
Educational only — not financial advice. Every example below is hypothetical. This post goes deeper on one countermeasure from behavioural biases that hurt stock pickers most: pre-committed exit rules.
Direct answer
Before you place a buy order, write down (1) the thesis in two sentences, (2) the catalysts you expect and roughly when, and (3) kill criteria — specific, checkable facts that would prove the thesis wrong. Add a valuation ceiling, a position-size limit, and a time stop. Then review only at defined triggers (earnings, major filings, large price moves) and ask one question: has a kill criterion been met? If yes, exit or cut back unless you can write down why the criterion was wrong — before looking at your gain or loss.
Why pre-commitment works
| Bias | What it does to sell decisions | How written criteria counter it |
|---|---|---|
| Disposition effect | Sell winners too early, hold losers too long | The criterion, not the P&L, decides |
| Anchoring | Wait to “get back to even” | Your purchase price doesn’t appear in any criterion |
| Confirmation bias | Explain away bad news | The disproof was defined before you were invested |
| Sunk cost | “I’ve done so much research” | Research time isn’t a reason to own |
| Recency | Panic on one bad quarter | Kill criteria usually require a trend, not one data point |
The five types of sell criteria
| Type | What it tests | Example wording (hypothetical) |
|---|---|---|
| Thesis break (kill criterion) | Did the reason to own disappear? | “Exit if same-store sales growth is negative for two consecutive quarters.” |
| Valuation ceiling | Is the upside priced in? | “Trim if price exceeds my high-case value of $68.” |
| Time stop | Did the catalyst arrive? | “If the new mine isn’t producing by Q4 next year, reassess from zero.” |
| Size limit | Has it grown too big? | “Trim back to 6% if the position exceeds 10% of the portfolio.” See position sizing. |
| Opportunity cost | Is there a clearly better use of the capital? | “Replace only if the new idea scores higher on my brief template and fits the sector cap.” |
Price drops are deliberately missing from the list. A falling price is a review trigger, not a sell criterion — it tells you to check the kill criteria, not to sell.
Writing kill criteria that actually work
Good kill criteria share four properties:
| Property | Weak version | Strong version |
|---|---|---|
| Specific | “If growth slows” | “If organic revenue growth falls below 3% for two quarters” |
| Observable | “If management loses focus” | “If the CEO or CFO leaves without a named successor” |
| Linked to the thesis | “If the stock falls 20%” | “If the dividend payout ratio on free cash flow exceeds 100% for a full year” |
| Sourced | “If things look bad” | “As reported in the MD&A or quarterly results” — see how to read an MD&A |
Aim for two or three kill criteria per stock. More than five usually means the thesis itself is fuzzy.
Worked example: a hypothetical Canadian pipeline holding
| Field | Entry (written before buying) |
|---|---|
| Thesis | Contracted, fee-based cash flows support a growing dividend; a large expansion project adds cash flow in two years. |
| Catalysts | Project in service by end of next year; annual dividend increase. |
| Kill criteria | (1) Distributable cash flow payout ratio above 90% for four straight quarters. (2) Net debt to EBITDA above the company’s own stated ceiling with no plan to fix it. (3) Project cancelled or written down. |
| Valuation ceiling | Trim if price exceeds my high-case value. |
| Size limit | Max 8% of portfolio. |
| Time stop | If the project slips more than 12 months, re-underwrite from scratch. |
| Review triggers | Quarterly results, any material change report, a 20% price move. |
Planned vs improvised exits
Keeping a log of why you sold is as useful as the criteria themselves. After a year or two you’ll see which criteria fire, which you ignore, and whether improvised exits helped or hurt.
A review routine that respects the plan
| Trigger | What to do |
|---|---|
| Quarterly results | Check each kill criterion against the new numbers; update the brief |
| Material change report or big news | Ask whether a criterion is affected; most news isn’t decisive |
| Price down 20%+ (hypothetical threshold) | Re-read the thesis and kill criteria before looking at the chart again |
| Criterion met | Exit or reduce unless you can write a specific reason the criterion was wrong |
| Changing a criterion | Allowed only with a written reason, dated, and not on the day of a big price move |
In a taxable account, also note the tax side before selling — capital gains, adjusted cost base and, if you plan to buy back, the superficial loss rule. Tax should inform the how of an exit, rarely the whether.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Why it hurts | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Using only a price stop | Sells good businesses on noise, holds bad ones that drift | Pair price triggers with thesis-based criteria |
| Vague criteria | Easy to rationalize | Make each one specific and observable |
| Moving the goalposts | Turns criteria into decoration | Change only with a dated, written reason |
| No time stop | Dead money ties up capital for years | Put a date on the catalyst |
| Criteria in your head | Memory is edited by outcomes | Keep them in the stock’s brief or journal |
Go deeper
A one-page “Thesis → Catalyst → Kill Criteria” card is planned for the DIY Process ebook. You can build your own today with the free bull / bear / watch brief template.
Related reading
- Behavioural biases that hurt stock pickers most
- How to build a simple stock brief template (bull / bear / watch)
- Position sizing for DIY stock pickers
- SEDAR+ alerts and filing types: monitoring stocks you already own
Sources
- Shefrin, H. and Statman, M. (1985), “The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long,” Journal of Finance 40(3).
- Odean, T. (1998), “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?,” Journal of Finance 53(5).
Media credits
- Hero: “Emergency exit sign 2016.jpg” by Santeri Viinamäki, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and resized to 1280×720. Real photograph, not AI-generated.
By Andrew · stocksummarizer.com
Guides · coming soon
Want the playbook in one place?
We are compiling free literacy hubs into paid ebook playbooks (Research, Valuation without fake precision, Dividend safety). Soft launch only for now — keep using these free guides, and browse ebooks when a guide ships.
Preview ebook shelfRelated reading
- Investing guideBehavioural Biases That Hurt Stock Pickers Most
- Investing guideConcentration Risk When Canada Is Already Concentrated
- Investing guideBuilding a Core-Satellite Portfolio: Index Core + Stock Satellites
- RCI.A summaryRogers Communications (RCI.A) — Completes C$4.35B MLSE buyout to 100% ownership
- CCO summaryCameco (CCO) — Westinghouse IPO windfall vs a 153x trailing P/E
- Sector deep diveCanadian telecom stocks: dividend resets, Quebecor’s run, valuation and analyst targets
- Investing guideHow to Research a TSX Stock from Scratch (Canadian DIY Framework)
- Investing guideHow to Read Quarterly Earnings for TSX Companies
- Investing guideHow to Compare Two TSX Peers Side by Side
Educational only — not financial advice. Do your own research. See our disclosures.